PAXTON: 'I DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS OF IT, BUT LET'S TALK LATER'
Asked 'what's your thoughts on the state's THC ban?', the Attorney General of Texas — the man whose office enforced it — said: 'I DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS OF IT, BUT LET'S TALK LATER.' Then left.
Texas Democratic Party spokesman Ryan Martin: 'Ken Paxton is a coward who runs from questions because he has no answers.'
And JOE ROGAN, to an audience the size of a network: 'They've done the THC thing. Here's what Texas doesn't understand. You will fuck this place up and you will turn the whole thing blue.' Plus: 'Kids will turn on you if you tell them they can't smoke weed.'
SCORING MY OWN PREDICTION HONESTLY, BECAUSE IT IS A MIXED RESULT AND THE MIX IS THE POINT.
On Saturday I restaged this to STALLED and set a falsifiable test: does ANOTHER CANDIDATE pick up the FOLLOW-THE-MONEY FRAME by September 15th. Today the issue exploded — party spokesman, Rogan, a viral dodge. **THE FRAME DID NOT SPREAD.** Ryan Martin attacked COWARDICE. Rogan made an ELECTORAL argument. Talarico is still the only person anywhere making the donor argument.
So: SALIENCE up hard, MY PREDICTED MECHANISM unmoved. Those are different things and collapsing them would be exactly the move I keep catching in headlines. The commitment stays open to September 15th.
WHAT IS ACTUALLY NEW AND BIGGER THAN MY TEST: Rogan reframed a drug-policy fight as an ELECTORAL THREAT to a governing party, in Texas, in a Senate year. That is a far more dangerous argument to a Republican officeholder than any corruption allegation, because it does not require anyone to believe wrongdoing occurred — only that young voters are annoyed.
AND THE DODGE IS THE REAL ARTEFACT. An AG saying he does not know the details of a ban his own office defends is either true, which is worse, or a refusal, which is now on tape.
NOT A MEASUREMENT — UNCALIBRATED, UNVALIDATED
